Legality and effectiveness of Digital Fingerprinting
Legality-
As you've probably figured out by
this point, digital
fingerprinting can be a powerful -- perhaps even invasive --
technology. Do you like the thought of your every online move being tracked,
even if it's only for the purpose of targeted advertising? Here's a better
question: Is it even legal?
Identity tracking fingerprinting
treads on shaky ethical ground that may be deemed overly invasive and unlawful
in the future. But because it's a developing technology, those legal issues are
still being sorted out. And with the Internet being a global network,
laws regarding digital fingerprinting may develop completely differently from
one country to another.
According to Canada's guidelines,
a digital fingerprint likely constitutes personal information, so usage of that
information could be in violation of Canadian privacy laws. Canadian
organizations are required to exhaust every possible non-invasive method of
personal identification before resorting to methods like fingerprinting.
Because fingerprinting "may collect more information than is necessary to
identify fraudulent and duplicate respondents in online research,"
Canadian organizations could get in trouble for tracking people unless they've
received permission or exhausted all other opportunities.
The first form of digital
fingerprinting we covered -- matching identifying characteristics of
copyrighted media to a database -- doesn't suffer from the same ethical
challenges as identity tracking. License holders have the right to protect
their content, and nothing about this form of fingerprinting invades the user's
privacy. Ideally, fingerprinting will actually decrease the number
of copyright infringement lawsuits by stopping the illegal dissemination
of licensed media. Viacom's $1 billion lawsuit against YouTube was thrown out
of court in 2010 because Google was found to be in compliance with the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Because the site took down illegal videos when
notified, it was protected under the DMCA and wasn't held liable for the
actions of its users. With better fingerprinting technology, the lawsuit may
never have arisen at all. That statement puts a lot of faith into
fingerprinting technology.
Effectiveness-
Digital fingerprinting sounds like
the perfect technology to combat Internet piracy. It prevents users from
spreading copyrighted content and potentially bypasses the hassle and expense
of lawsuits. Once implemented by an organization, digital fingerprinting
is a largely automated system, which means less work for content providers and
media sites alike. Of course, all that convenience assumes one critical thing:
that digital fingerprinting actually works.
Digital fingerprinting must be
able to identify thousands or millions of pieces of content -- content that can
be disseminated in many media formats, cropped or edited in unexpected ways, or
even recorded off a movie theater screen. Video elements like color, bitrate
and even resolution can vary from video to video. With all those variables, can
digital fingerprinting really work?
In 2007, Audible Magic's Copysense
fingerprinting technology was put to the test in an online video site called
Soapbox. Soapbox was a Microsoft project that allowed users to upload
videos a la YouTube. Even with Audible Magic's fingerprinting technology at
work, tech site Gigaom was easily able to upload a copyrighted video from
Comedy Central's "The Daily Show". It took days for the clip to be
taken down from Soapbox -- even after Gigaom contacted Microsoft and Audible
Magic for comment. Thinking the clip would then be indexed and protected
against illicit sharing, Gigaom tried to upload it again. It worked. They had
similar success on Myspace, which also employs Audible Magic's fingerprinting.
Audible Magic protects against 11
million songs, movies and television shows. But with decades of media at our
fingertips in digital form, the software obviously can't safeguard against all
illegal uploads. Digital fingerprinting also can't stop most peer-to-peer file
sharing, which distributes material directly between users. The effectiveness
of digital fingerprinting in the future is entirely up in the air. If companies
like Audible Magic continue to improve their recognition systems and expand
their fingerprint databases, sites with user-generated content will be easier
to maintain and the technology that identifies media will be more powerful than
ever. Who knows? In 20 years, apps like Shazam may be able to differentiate
between two live concert versions of "Free Bird" based on the length
of a guitar solo.
Comments
Post a Comment